IN OUR ELEMENT WITH MIKE GEDEON: WHAT MAKES A GOOD SPRING MATERIAL?
By: Mike Gedeon, Customer Technical Services Manager, Materion Performance Alloys and Composites
Over the years I have received many technical materials questions. One that comes up quite often is “Does this make a good spring material?” I also hear “My current material is not working. How do I make it springier?” The answer, of course, is that it depends on what you are trying to do with the spring. There is a difference depending on whether you need more force, less force, more deflection, less deflection, etc. So, to select a material that meets your requirements, you will have to focus on different material properties, depending on the different desired outcomes below.
- Maximizing Spring Rate/Stiffness: Spring rate is the ratio of the reaction force to the applied deflection. In order to increase it, you need to use a material with a higher modulus, or you need to modify the geometry. In beam contacts, you do this by increasing width/radius, thickness, or decreasing length. Stiffness is the opposite of flexibility.
- Maximizing Peak Force: For this you would need a higher modulus material to increase the spring rate, and perhaps a higher yield strength material to allow the stress to build up to a sufficient level to provide the needed force. If the spring force is too low because the material is yielding, then copper beryllium or other age hardenable alloys can be heat treated to increase the yield strength and achieve a greater force before the material yields. However, if the peak force is too low and the material has not yet yielded, it is impossible to heat treat greater stiffness into the material. In the latter case, you would need to increase the spring rate by changing the geometry or using a material with a higher elastic modulus, as discussed above.
- Maximizing Stroke/Flexibility: To get the most deflection out the material, you need good flexibility and/or high elastic resilience, the ratio of yield strength to elastic modulus. Reducing the stiffness would increase the maximum allowable deflection, but at a penalty of reduced contact force.
- Maximizing Impact Resistance/Energy Absorption/Surviving Drops: For this you would need a high modulus of resilience (yield strength2/elastic modulus). High resilience is important to maximize the deflection and high strength is important to maximize the allowable stress. Together, as the modulus of resilience, they maximize the amount of energy that the spring can absorb before failure.
- Maximizing Operating Cycles: In order to increase the number of operating cycles until fatigue failure, choose a material with a high fatigue strength or modify the geometry to reduce the stress.
- Minimizing Wear: Use a material with a high hardness to decrease contact friction and minimize abrasive wear.
- Maximizing Operating Life: To ensure the maximum life, you need to ensure consistent contact force over the life of the connector. For this you would need high conductivity to minimize temperature rise, good stress relaxation resistance to keep the force above the minimum required, and good fatigue strength if the part is highly cycled.
- Minimizing Vibration: In order to minimize the amplitude of vibration, it is important to increase the stiffness of the spring, similarly to maximizing peak force. Also, verify that the geometry does not have a resonant frequency near the expected frequency of vibration, or you will end up with a rapid and unexpected fatigue failure.
- Maximizing Current-Carrying Capacity: For this you would need to increase the electrical and thermal conductivity, increase the spring’s cross-sectional area, or decrease the length of the conducting path.
Table 1 below summarizes the effect of various material properties and geometric variables on the performance of cantilever beam springs. Similar logic holds true for the other spring types, as long as you understand which variables are in the numerator and denominator of the force or torque verus deflection and stress versus defection curves.
Table 1. Summary of Design Tips to Improve Spring Behavior. Note that the recommendations for changing the geometry sometimes are in direct conflict with each other. Furthermore, they are also in conflict with the trend toward miniaturization of all components.
If you’d like to receive an email notification when new articles become available, sign up here.
Our goal for this new series is to give you access to technical information and resources that benefit you in your daily work. If there are topics you would like to hear about, feel free to email me directly.
Connect with me on LinkedIn for other ongoing industry updates.
Handbook of Spring Design ©1993 Spring Manufacturers Institute
Wahl, A.M. Mechanical Springs 2nd ed. ©1963 McGraw-Hill
Carlson, Harold Spring Designer’s Handbook ©1978 Marcel-Dekker, Inc.
Juvinall, Robert C. & Marshek, Kurt M. Fundamentals of Machine Component Design 2nd ed. ©1991 John Wiley & Sons
Mischke, Charles R. & Shigley, Joseph E. Mechanical Engineering Design 5th ed. ©1989 McGraw-Hill
Other Articles From Mike:
- Welcome to In Our Element
- Reliability and End-of-Life Contact Force in Connectors
- Magnetization Curves And Magnetic Properties
- What Is 5G? What Benefits Will it Bring?